SCMR 1999

1999SCMR2810 (PLP)

ZULFIQAR ALI — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Criminal Appeal No.243 of 1996, decided on 25th May, 1998
Honorable Judges
Nasir Aslam Zahid, Munawar Ahmed Mirza and Abdur Rehman Khan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1999SCMR2810 (PLP)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Nasir Aslam Zahid, Munawar Ahmed Mirza and Abdur Rehman Khan, JJ
Parties ZULFIQAR ALI — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Contempt of Court Act (LXIV of 1976)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999SCMR2810 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Contempt of Court Act (LXIV of 1976) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999SCMR2810 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Nasir Aslam Zahid, Munawar Ahmed Mirza and Abdur Rehman Khan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1999SCMR2810 (PLP) (ZULFIQAR ALI — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Contempt of Court Act (LXIV of 1976)

Representation

  • N.A. Butt, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner/Applicant.
  • Ch. M. Akram, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.

Headnotes / Summary

Ss. 4 & 5

Contempt of Court

Appeal before Supreme Court-- Unconditional apology

Effect

Accused/appellant was sentenced to 7 days simple imprisonment by High Court

Accused/appellant in a statement in writing which was signed by him and his counsel, had stated that at, the first available opportunity he had submitted unconditional apology and had thrown himself at the mercy of High Court

Said fact had found confirmation from order of the High Court-- -Accused/appellant in his statement in writing filed before Supreme Court had stated that he would be more careful in future and repeated his unconditional apology

Unconditional apology submitted by appellant was accepted by Supreme Court and order of sentence passed by High Court was set aside

Notice issued to appellant was recalled and appellant was cautioned to be careful in future. Ch. M. Akram, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.

Judgment & Decree

NASIR ASLAM ZAHID, J.

The petitioner/applicant was sentenced to 7 days' S.I. by order, dated 16-9-1996 by the High Court during the hearing of Criminal Miscellaneous No.2986-B of 1996. A statement in writing has been filed which is signed by the petitioner/applicant and also by his learned counsel Mr. N.A. Butt to the effect that at the first available opportunity the applicant had submitted an unconditional apology and had thrown himself at the mercy of the High Court and this finds confirmation from Para. 3 of the order of the High Court. In para. 3 of the statement filed in writing today the petitioner/applicant stated that he would be more careful in future and repeated his unconditional apology before this Court.

2. In the facts and circumstances of this case, unconditional apology is accepted, the order of sentence of seven days' S.I. by the High Court is set aside and the notice issued to him earlier are recalled. However, the petitioner/applicant has been cautioned to be careful in future. H.B.T./Z-24/S Order accordingly.