1985 PLP 1203 (SCMR)
Haji Noor Ahmad its Naib‑Secretary‑‑Appellant Versus NISAR AHMAD and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1985 PLP 1203 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and |
| Parties | Haji Noor Ahmad its Naib‑Secretary‑‑Appellant Versus NISAR AHMAD and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 PLP 1203 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 PLP 1203 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 PLP 1203 (SCMR) (Haji Noor Ahmad its Naib‑Secretary‑‑Appellant Versus NISAR AHMAD and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sh. Rafiq Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court and M.A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Appellant (in both Appeals).
- Ch. Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court and S. Inayat Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents Nos. 1, 2 and 3 (in both Appeals).
- Date of hearing: 3rd February, 1985.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore dated 19‑1‑1970 in C.R.Nos. 456 and 457 of 1964). ‑‑‑O.XXIII, r.3‑‑Compromise‑‑Counsel for contesting sides requesting for disposal of appeals in accordance with written compromise‑‑Terms of compromise being reasonable, appeals disposed of accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑ The learned counsel for the contesting sides, having placed on record a compromise duly signed by them besides others, request for the disposal of these appeals in terms thereof. The compromise reads as follows: The terms of the compromise appear to be reasonable. These appeals are disposed of in terms of the afore‑recorded compromise. There shall be no order as to costs. M. I. Order accordingly.