PCRLJ 1994

1994 P Cr (PLP)

MURAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
N/A
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1994 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties MURAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (MURAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Akhtar Ali Qureshe for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497(1), first proviso

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/324/447/148/ 149/337-A & 337-F(ii)

Bail, grant of

Accused according to medical reports was suffering from Bilateral Ingunial Hernia and Prostatism and had already been operated for one disease

According to the Surgeon an emergency operation for the second disease could be needed at any time

Accused, therefore, was undoubtedly a sick person and he was allowed bail in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

Criminal Miscellaneous No.331/13 of 1993, decided on.24th April, 1993. Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

S. 497(1), first proviso

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/324/447/148/ 149/337-A & 337-F(ii)

Bail, grant of

Accused according to medical reports was suffering from Bilateral Ingunial Hernia and Prostatism and had already been operated for one disease

According to the Surgeon an emergency operation for the second disease could be needed at any time

Accused, therefore, was undoubtedly a sick person and he was allowed bail in circumstances. Akhtar Ali Qureshe for Petitioner. Dr. Yousaf Awan for the State. This is third time that the petitioner has come for bail. Earlier his two bail applications were dismissed on their merits. Now he seeks bail on the ground that he is sick and is lying admitted in the District Headquarter Hospital. There is on the file a report of the Surgeon, District Headquarter Hospital, Muzaffargarh as also a report of the Medical Officer, District Jail Hospital, Muzaffargarh. According to those reports the petitioner is sick; he is suffering from Bilateral Ingunial Hernia and Prostatism. He has already been operated for one; according to the Surgeon an emergency operation for the second may be needed at any time. There is, therefore, no doubt that the petitioner is sick. I, therefore, allow him to be released on bail on his A furnishing bond in the sum of Rs.50,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. N.H.Q./M-1396/L Bail allowed.