1987 PLP 282 (SCMR)
ABDUL MAJID‑‑Petitioner Versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION SHUJABAD and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1987 PLP 282 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | ABDUL MAJID‑‑Petitioner Versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION SHUJABAD and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 282 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 282 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 282 (SCMR) (ABDUL MAJID‑‑Petitioner Versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION SHUJABAD and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Taj Muhammad Khan Langah, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 14th December, 1986.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench dated 1‑11‑1986, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 223/11 of 1986). ‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Criminal Procedure Code S. 491 Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance 1979), Ss. 10 & 11‑‑Dismissal of habeas corpus petition challenged‑‑Petitioner claiming that detenu, a young girl of about 15 years is married to him and is being illegally detained by her father‑‑Criminal case under Ss.10 & 11 of offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979) having been registered against petitioner at instance of her father, Supreme Court declined to interfere with order of High Court and refused leave to appeal. Nemo for the Respondents.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Criminal Procedure Code S. 491 Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance 1979), Ss. 10 & 11‑‑Dismissal of habeas corpus petition challenged‑‑Petitioner claiming that detenu, a young girl of about 15 years is married to him and is being illegally detained by her father‑‑Criminal case under Ss.10 & 11 of offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979) having been registered against petitioner at instance of her father, Supreme Court declined to interfere with order of High Court and refused leave to appeal. Taj Muhammad Khan Langah, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for the Respondents. Date of hearing: 14th December, 1986. SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.‑‑This is a petition for special leave to appeal from the order dated 1‑11‑1986 of the Lahore High Court dismissing the habeas corpus petition of the petitioner. The alleged detenu is a young girl. According to the petitioner she is above 15 years of age. The petitioner claims that she is married to him and is being illegally detained by her father. It may be mentioned that a criminal case under sections 10 and 11 of the Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance had been registered against the petitioner at the instance of her father.
2. We have heard the learned counsel and see no good ground for interfering with the order of the High Court. The petition for leave is, therefore, dismissed. M. I. Petition dismissed.