2010 PLP 1090 (YLR)
DOST MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2010 PLP 1090 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Malik Saeed Ejaz, J |
| Parties | DOST MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 1090 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 1090 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Malik Saeed Ejaz, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 1090 (YLR) (DOST MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Tariq Zulfiqar Ahmad Chaudhry for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.337-F(i), 337-F(v), 337-A(i), 337-L(ii), 337-H(ii), 379, 148 & 149--Hurt and theft--Bail, grant of
Counsel for accused had submitted that he was ready to pay the amount of "Daman" provided accused was granted post-arrest bail
Counsel for the complainant and D.P.G. had not opposed the said prayer of counsel for accused
Bail was granted subject to payment of `Daman', accordingly. Nadir Manzoor Dugal, Dy. P.-G. with Nazar Hussain, S.-I. for the State. Mehr Maqbool Ahmad Hanjra for the Complainant.
Judgment & Decree
MALIK SAEED EJAZ, J.
Seeks post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.236/2006, dated 17-9-2006 registered at P.S. Chhab Kallan, District Khanewal in respect of offences under sections 337-F(v), 337-F(i), 337-A(i), 337-L(ii), 337-H(ii), 379, 148 and 149, P.P.C.
2. At the very outset learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is ready to pay the amount of "Daman" provided the petitioner is granted post-arrest bail.
3. Learned counsel for the complainant has not opposed this prayer, which is even otherwise reasonable. The learned D.P.-G. has also not opposed the said prayer. Consequently, this application is accepted and subject to payment of amount of "Daman" and furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, the post-arrest bail is granted to the petitioner. The amount of "Daman" if deposited by the petitioner would remain with learned trial Court till the conclusion of the trial, whereafter the same would be paid to the party found entitled to recover the same in terms of the final judgment. H.B.T./D-2/L Bail granted.