1989SCMR 1681 (PLP)
MUHAMMAD AKBAR QURESHI‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and 2 others Respondents
| Citation | 1989SCMR 1681 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD AKBAR QURESHI‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and 2 others Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ ‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989SCMR 1681 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ ‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989SCMR 1681 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989SCMR 1681 (PLP) (MUHAMMAD AKBAR QURESHI‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and 2 others Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian M. Zafar Yasin, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the order of the Service Tribunal dated 13‑11‑1980 in Appeal No‑1573 (L)/78). ‑Art, 212(3)‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to consider the contention that without holding a proper inquiry and without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner which amounted to condemning him unheard, the order of Tribunal was contrary to law. Dale of hearing 2nd ,July. 1988.
Judgment & Decree
GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑Muhammad Akbar Oureshi son of Ghulam Mohy‑ud‑Din Qureshi, ex‑Assistant Central Intelligence Officer, resident of 65‑,I, Model Town, Lahore, seeks leave to appeal against the order of the Service Tribunal, Government of Pakistan, dated 13‑11‑1980. Learned counsel appearing in support of this petition contended, inter alia, that without holding a proper inquiry and without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner which amounts to condemning him unheard the order of the Tribunal is contrary to law. The submission is not devoid of force. We grant leave to appeal. Security Rs. 5,
000. Appeal to he prepared on the present record. Parties are at liberty to file additional documents, if they so wish, within two months. M.A.K./M‑912‑S Leave granted.