2001 PLP 1191 (YLR)
HUSSAIN and 2 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2001 PLP 1191 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Faiz Muhammad Qureshi, J |
| Parties | HUSSAIN and 2 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP 1191 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP 1191 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Faiz Muhammad Qureshi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP 1191 (YLR) (HUSSAIN and 2 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302 & 324
Role of the accused persons was same as that of the co- accused who had been granted bail
Accused were entitled to the concession of bail on the principle of equity and consistency. 1979 SCMR 9 ref. Abdul Rasool Abbasi for Applicants. Muhammad Azim Panhwar, State Counsel.
Judgment & Decree
The present applicants are seeking bail in Crime No. 10 of 2001 registered with Police Station Johi under sections 302, 324, P.P.C. The applicants moved bail application before the trial Court but without success, hence this application. Learned counsel for the applicants has contended that the co-accused namely Ali Nawaz has been granted bail by this Court on 2-7-2001 and the role of the present applicants is same and their case is to be put in the similar situation. According to him the present applicants are entitled to the concession of bail on the principle of equity and consistency. He has placed reliance only as 1979 SCMR
9. On the other hand learned counsel for the State has not controverted the contention being raised by the learned counsel for the applicants and has recorded his no -objection on the ground that the case of the present applicants is falling in the similar situation as co-accused Ali Nawaz has been granted bail by this Court. In view of the aforementioned legal position and on the basis of principle of equity and consistency, law cited by learned counsel for the applicant, I am of the considered view that the present applicants Hussain, Shahnawaz and Muhammad Ramzan are also entitled to the concession of bail on the principle of equity and consistency. Accordingly all the three applicants are granted bail in the sum of 8.3,00,000 and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. This bail application stands disposed of. H.B.T./H-49/K Bail granted.