1989 PCr (PLP)
MAQBOOL AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PCr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Rashid Aziz Khan, J |
| Parties | MAQBOOL AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PCr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PCr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Rashid Aziz Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PCr (PLP) (MAQBOOL AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Faiz Muhammad Sadiq for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Art.3/4‑‑Bail‑ Accused named in First Information Report, apprehended at spot while selling heroin to a decoy customer‑‑Twenty‑two grams of heroin was also recovered from possession of the accused‑‑Nothing had been brought on record to give even the slightest indication `that case had been manoeuvred against accused because of mala fides of police‑‑Bail refused. Abdul Samad Hashmi alongwith Akhtar Shabbir, Addl. A:‑G. for the ',State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Art.3/4‑‑Bail‑ Accused named in First Information Report, apprehended at spot while selling heroin to a decoy customer‑‑Twenty‑two grams of heroin was also recovered from possession of the accused‑‑Nothing had been brought on record to give even the slightest indication `that case had been manoeuvred against accused because of mala fides of police‑‑Bail refused. Ch. Faiz Muhammad Sadiq for Petitioner. Abdul Samad Hashmi alongwith Akhtar Shabbir, Addl. A:‑G. for the ',State. A case under Article 3/4 of Order No.4 of 1979 (Prohibition of Hadd) Order 4, 1979 stands registered against the petitioner with Police Station Nawan Kot, Lahore, vide F.I.R. dated 12‑12‑1988. According to the allegations contained in the F.I.R. the petitioner used to sell heroin. In pursuance of the said information, a raiding party was constituted and the petitioner was arrested while selling heroin to a fake customer. Twenty‑two grams of heroin was recovered from his possession as well.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely involved in the commission of the offence. Contends that no respectable of the locality was associated with the raid proceedings therefore, they became highly doubtful. The contentions have been opposed by learned counsel for the State.
3. I have heard the learned counsel and perused the record. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and was apprehended at the spot while selling heroin to a decoy customer. Twenty‑two grams of heroin was also recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Nothing has been brought on the record to give even a slightest indication that the present case has been manoeuvred against the petitioner because of the mala fides, of the police. For what has been discussed above, I find no merit in the petition, which is, accordingly, dismissed: M.Y.H./M‑1415/L Bail refused.