1989 PLP 798 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD RAMZAN — Petitioner Versus MEMBER (REV.), BOARD OF REVENUE and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP 798 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD RAMZAN — Petitioner Versus MEMBER (REV.), BOARD OF REVENUE and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Punjab Pre-emption Act (I of 1913) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 798 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Pre-emption Act (I of 1913) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 798 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 798 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD RAMZAN — Petitioner Versus MEMBER (REV.), BOARD OF REVENUE and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Aslam Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners (in No. 689 of 1982)
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Raja Mahmood Akhtar, Advocate Supreme Court, Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners (in No. 833 of 1985).
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Rana Maqbool Ahmad Oadri, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners (in No.918 of 1982).
- Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 5th June, 1988.
- Muhammad Aslam Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners (in No. 689 of 1982)
- Raja Mahmood Akhtar, Advocate Supreme Court, Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners (in No. 833 of 1985).
- Rana Maqbool Ahmad Oadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners (in No.918 of 1982).
- Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
- Ch. Mushtaq Ahmad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for Pctitioners~m Nos. 91, 103 and 104 of 1983.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 15--Pre-emption suit--No decree can be passed in a pre-emption suit after the target date viz. 31st July 1986 as per rule laid down by Supreme Court in Sardar Ali's case reported as P L D 1988 S C 287. 1982). Ch. Mushtaq Ahmad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for Pctitioners~m Nos. 91, 103 and 104 of 1983.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Lave to appeal has been sought in these cases by pre‑emptors. Their learned counsel have stated that no decree was passed in favour of any of them prior to 31‑7‑1986 by any Court at any stage. That being so, no decree can be passed in favour of any of them now as held by A this Court in case of Sardar Ali P L D 1988 S C
287. Leave to appeal accordingly is refused and the petitions are dismissed. AA./M‑717/S Leave refused.