1989 PLP 199 (MLD)
SAFIA BIBI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 199 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Fazal Karim, J |
| Parties | SAFIA BIBI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 199 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 199 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Fazal Karim, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 199 (MLD) (SAFIA BIBI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Syed Ejaz Hussain Gillani for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ ‑‑‑S. 561‑A‑‑Application under S. 561‑A, Cr.P.C. stating that petition apprehended danger to her life and that she should be sent to Dar‑ul‑Aman is not maintainable.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ ‑‑‑S. 561‑A‑‑Application under S. 561‑A, Cr.P.C. stating that petition apprehended danger to her life and that she should be sent to Dar‑ul‑Aman is not maintainable. Syed Ejaz Hussain Gillani for Petitioner. The petitioner was earlier allowed interim bail to enable her to approach the Sessions Court, Sialkot; yesterday, she made an application under section 561‑A, Cr.P.C. saying that she apprehended danger to her life and that she should be sent to Dar‑ul‑Aman. That application was disposed of, as in my view, section 561‑A, Cr.P.C. was not available to the petitioner. But as the petitioner had insisted that she had nowhere to go, the learned Additional Advocate‑Genera, Mr. Tanvir Ahmad Khan, spoke to the Incharge of Dar‑ul‑Aman. The petitions‑1 is now in Dar‑ul‑Aman and from there she has approached this Court for bail.
2. Admit. Notice for 14‑6‑1988.
3. In the meantime, the petitioner is admitted to interim bail on furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000 (Rupees fifteen thousand) with o surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of D.R. (J) of this Court. M.Z.S./S‑246/L Order according;