PCRLJ 1987

1987 P Cr (PLP)

KHAN MUHAMMAD KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1200/B of 1987, decided on 9th May, 1987.
Honorable Judges
Ijaz Nisar, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1987 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Ijaz Nisar, J
Parties KHAN MUHAMMAD KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Nisar, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 P Cr (PLP) (KHAN MUHAMMAD KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

Representation

  • Muhammad Asghar Khan Rokhari for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑No injury to deceased or any prosecution witness attributed to petitioner‑ Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1200/B of 1987, decided on 9th May, 1987. ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑No injury to deceased or any prosecution witness attributed to petitioner‑ Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances. Muhammad Asghar Khan Rokhari for Petitioner. Khan Muhammad Khan son of Muhammad Khan alongwith 6 others stands charged with the murder of Aman Ullah deceased on 15‑ 10‑ 1986 with a gunshot over enmity of previous murders.

2. Bail is claimed on the ground that only ineffective firing is attributed to the petitioner and that Inayat Ullah co‑accused similarly placed has already been admitted to bail by this Court. Keeping in view the fact that no injury to the deceased or any P.W. is attributed to the petitioner, I admit him to bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C. Mianwali. S.G.D./K‑18/L Bail allowed.