SCMR 1986

1986 PLP 1180 (SCMR)

Mst. BHAGAN BIBI — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM and others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Petition No. 1234 of 1984, decided on 12th November,1985.
Honorable Judges
Nasim Hasan Shah and S.A. Nusrat, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1986 PLP 1180 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Nasim Hasan Shah and S.A. Nusrat, JJ
Parties Mst. BHAGAN BIBI — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM and others — Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1180 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1180 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah and S.A. Nusrat, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1180 (SCMR) (Mst. BHAGAN BIBI — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Representation

  • G.A. Farid Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
  • Nemo for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing: 12th November, 1985.
  • G.A. Farid Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court at Lahore, dated 20-10-1984 passed in Constitutional Petition No. 2388 of 1984).

Arts. 185(3) & 199--Writ jurisdiction, exercise of--Leave to appeal granted to consider whether High Court in writ jurisdiction was justified in interfering with concurrent findings of fact recorded by Rent Controller and confirmed by First Appellate Court.

Judgment & Decree

S.A. NUSRAT, J.‑‑The contention requiring examination in this petition is whether the learned High Court was justified in interfering with the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the Rent Controller and confirmed by the First Appellate Court in the exercise of writ jurisdiction. Leave is granted. Security Rs.1,000. M. I. Leave granted.