2009 PLP 1039 (MLD)
SALAHUD-DIN-AYYUBI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2009 PLP 1039 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | SALAHUD-DIN-AYYUBI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 1039 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 1039 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 1039 (MLD) (SALAHUD-DIN-AYYUBI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Atif Raza Iqbal for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.420/468/471
Bail before arrest, refusal of
Accused, who was not in attendance, thrice obtained bail before arrest, but he did not appear before the court thereafter
After obtaining bail before arrest accused had not appeared in High Court also
Such conduct of accused had disentitled him to the discretionary relief of bail before arrest
Even otherwise accused was nominated in the F.I.R. and serious allegation of preparing forged documents had been levelled against him
Bail application was dismissed, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
ABDUL SHAKOOR PARACHA, J.
Salah-ud-Din Ayyubi son of Abdul Ghani, petitioner, through this petition under section 498, Cr.P.C. seeks bail before arrest in case registered vide F.I.R. No.669, dated 4-6-2008, at Police Station North Cantt., Lahore for offences under sections 420/468/471, P. P. C.
2. The petitioner is not in attendance I have been informed by the DPG, assisted by learned counsel for the complainant; that the petitioner thrice obtained bail before arrest from the Sessions Court and he did not appear before the said Court thereafter. After obtaining bail before arrest he has not appeared in this Court also. This conduct of the petitioner disentitles him to the discretionary relief of bail before arrest. Even otherwise, the petitioner is nominated in the F.I.R. and serious allegation of preparing forged documents has been levelled against him. Therefore, this petition is dismissed. H.B.T./S-94/L Bail refused.