CLC 1981

1981 PLP 786 (CLC)

UNITED BANK LTD.‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS LYALLPUR BUS SERVICE ETC.‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Civil Revision No. 707 of 1978, decided on 22nd November, 1980.
Honorable Judges
Khurshid Ahmad, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1981 PLP 786 (CLC)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Khurshid Ahmad, J
Parties UNITED BANK LTD.‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS LYALLPUR BUS SERVICE ETC.‑Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 786 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 786 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Khurshid Ahmad, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 786 (CLC) (UNITED BANK LTD.‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS LYALLPUR BUS SERVICE ETC.‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Muhammad Mohsin Ansari for Petitioner.
  • Rafiq Ahmad Bajwa for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing : 22nd November, 1980.

Headnotes / Summary

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ ‑‑ O. I, r. 10 read with O. XXX, r. 1‑Suit against firm‑Impleading of partners‑Plaintiff‑petitioner praying for impleading other partners as defendants in suit against firm defendant‑respondent for recovery of money on basis of mortgageHeld, in view of clear provisions of O. XXX, r. 1 no application could be made for impleading other partners as defendants. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑ ‑‑ O. VI, r. 17‑Amendment of plaintSuit for recovery of money on basis of mortgageFact of mortgage mentioned in plaint‑Peti tioner applying for amendment of plaint so as to incorporate particulars of mortgage and to make prayer in conformity with O. XXXIV and Form No. 45 of Appendix A of First Schedule to Code of Civil ProcedureHeld, proposed amendments would neither introduce new cause of action nor change complexion of suit.‑[Plaint].

Judgment & Decree

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ ‑‑ O. I, r. 10 read with O. XXX, r. 1‑Suit against firm‑Impleading of partners‑Plaintiff‑petitioner praying for impleading other partners as defendants in suit against firm defendant‑respondent for recovery of money on basis of mortgageHeld, in view of clear provisions of O. XXX, r. 1 no application could be made for impleading other partners as defendants. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑ ‑‑ O. VI, r. 17‑Amendment of plaintSuit for recovery of money on basis of mortgageFact of mortgage mentioned in plaint‑Peti tioner applying for amendment of plaint so as to incorporate particulars of mortgage and to make prayer in conformity with O. XXXIV and Form No. 45 of Appendix A of First Schedule to Code of Civil ProcedureHeld, proposed amendments would neither introduce new cause of action nor change complexion of suit.‑[Plaint]. Muhammad Mohsin Ansari for Petitioner. Rafiq Ahmad Bajwa for Respondents. Date of hearing : 22nd November, 1980.