1989 PLP 4085 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD SHARIF Petitioner Versus AMANULLAH Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 4085 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Riaz Ahmad, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD SHARIF Petitioner Versus AMANULLAH Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 4085 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 4085 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Riaz Ahmad, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 4085 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD SHARIF Petitioner Versus AMANULLAH Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian Sarfraz‑ul‑Hassan for Petitioner
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497(5)‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302‑‑Bail, cancellation of‑‑Affidavit was filed to the effect that accused was trying to subborn witnesses‑‑Police was not approached with regard to threats alleged to have been advanced by accused‑ Interference declined with order of Court granting bail.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 497(5)‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302‑‑Bail, cancellation of‑‑Affidavit was filed to the effect that accused was trying to subborn witnesses‑‑Police was not approached with regard to threats alleged to have been advanced by accused‑ Interference declined with order of Court granting bail. Mian Sarfraz‑ul‑Hassan for Petitioner According to the statements of two witnesses recorded under section 161, Cr.P.C., the respondent was shown to be empty‑handed and no part was assigned to him in the F.I.R. That is why, the respondent was allowed bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge.
2. In support of this petition seeking cancellation of bail allowed to the respondent it is contended, that the respondent is trying to suborn the witnesses, and to substantiate the same, affidavits of some witnesses have been filed. To rebut the same, counter‑affidavits have also been filed. Police was not approached with regard to the threats alleged to have been advanced by the respondent. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the grant of bail allowed to the respondent. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. M.Y.H./M‑1529/L