1989 PLP 1411(1) (SCMR)
GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB‑‑Petitioner Versus A. R. TOOSI, S.E.‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 1411(1) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB‑‑Petitioner Versus A. R. TOOSI, S.E.‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1411(1) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1411(1) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1411(1) (SCMR) (GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB‑‑Petitioner Versus A. R. TOOSI, S.E.‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- S.M. Zubair, Addl. A.‑G., M. Abdullah Bajwa, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 12th July, 1988.
- We have heard learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Government. He was unable to point out any error of law or question of public importance to be determined by this Court. There is no meat in this petition, which is hereby dismissed.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of the Punjab Service Tribunal dated 23‑8‑1981 in Appeal No.414/727 of 1980) ‑‑‑Art.212(3)‑‑Order for removal of warning from character roll of civil servant by Service Tribunal‑‑No error of law or question of public importance to be determined pointed out by the petitioner‑‑Leave to appeal refused.
Judgment & Decree
GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑Government of the Punjab through Secretary, Communication and Works Department, Lahore, has filed this petition for leave to appeal against the judgment of the Punjab Service Tribunal dated 23‑8‑1981 whereby the appeal of the respondent was accepted and the Tribunal ordered removal of warning from the respondent's character roll. We have heard learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Government. He was unable to point out any error of law or question of public importance to be determined by this Court. There is no meat in this petition, which is hereby dismissed. M.B.A./G‑181/S Petition dismissed.