1994 PLP 1922 (CLC)
MUHAMMAD IQBAL‑‑‑Petitioner Versus VICE‑CHANCELLOR, ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY, BAHAWALPUR
| Citation | 1994 PLP 1922 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ausaf Ali Khan, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD IQBAL‑‑‑Petitioner Versus VICE‑CHANCELLOR, ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY, BAHAWALPUR |
| Primary Law | Calendar of the University of the Punjab‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 1922 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Calendar of the University of the Punjab‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 1922 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ausaf Ali Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 1922 (CLC) (MUHAMMAD IQBAL‑‑‑Petitioner Versus VICE‑CHANCELLOR, ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY, BAHAWALPUR). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Maqbool Ahmad Shah Akhtar for Petitioner.
- Shamshir Iqbal Chughtai for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 16th February, 1994.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑ Part 111, Chap. 1, Regln. 4‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199 With holding of petitioner's BA. Examination result‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Petitioner had appeared in B.Sc. Examination but failed in 1991‑‑‑Petitioner, thereafter, submitted Admission Form for BA. Examination held in 1992 without disclosing his earlier attempt in B.Sc. Examination‑‑‑Petitioner had admittedly suppressed factum of his appearance in B.Se. Examination of 1991‑‑‑Petitioner could not have appeared in the BA. Examination within next two years in accordance with prohibition contained in Regln. 4, Chap. 1, Part 111, Calendar of the University of the Punjab‑‑‑Petitioner's result had been rightly withheld on account of irregularities committed by him‑‑‑Constitutional petition was not maintainable in circumstances. [p. 1922] A
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑ Part 111, Chap. 1, Regln. 4‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199 With holding of petitioner's BA. Examination result‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Petitioner had appeared in B.Sc. Examination but failed in 1991‑‑‑Petitioner, thereafter, submitted Admission Form for BA. Examination held in 1992 without disclosing his earlier attempt in B.Sc. Examination‑‑‑Petitioner had admittedly suppressed factum of his appearance in B.Se. Examination of 1991‑‑‑Petitioner could not have appeared in the BA. Examination within next two years in accordance with prohibition contained in Regln. 4, Chap. 1, Part 111, Calendar of the University of the Punjab‑‑‑Petitioner's result had been rightly withheld on account of irregularities committed by him‑‑‑Constitutional petition was not maintainable in circumstances. [p. 1922] A Maqbool Ahmad Shah Akhtar for Petitioner. Shamshir Iqbal Chughtai for Respondents. Date of hearing: 16th February, 1994. The petitioner had appeared in B.Sc. Examination and failed in 1991. Then he submitted admission form for BA. Examination held in 1992 without disclosing his earlier attempting B.Sc. Examination. This time he succeeded but the respondents did not issue the result card/degree, where against the petitioner has filed the present writ petition. 2. 1n reply, the respondents have pleaded that firstly the petitioner had not disclosed his appearance in the earlier B.Sc. Examination and secondly that he could not even appear in the later BA. Examination within the next two years.
3. After going through the comments, the relevant record and respective contentions of both the parties, I find that the petitioner had really suppressed the factum of his appearance in the B.Sc. Examination of 1991 as he crossed Column No. 11 of the Form. Under Regulation 4 of Chapter 1, Part III, of the Calendar of the University of the Punjab, the petitioner could not appear in the later BA. Examination. Therefore, finding the aforementioned irregularities to have been committed, the petitioner's result had rightly been withheld. The writ petition has no force and is hereby dismissed. AA./M‑1642/L Petition dismissed,