2009 PLP 57 (YLR)
SAIMA HASSAN and others — Applicants Versus SAJJAD AHMAD — Respondent
| Citation | 2009 PLP 57 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Sayed Zahid Hussain, J |
| Parties | SAIMA HASSAN and others — Applicants Versus SAJJAD AHMAD — Respondent |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 57 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 57 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Sayed Zahid Hussain, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 57 (YLR) (SAIMA HASSAN and others — Applicants Versus SAJJAD AHMAD — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Zahid Hussain Khan for Appellants.
Headnotes / Summary
S.5, Sched & S.25-A
Transfer of case--Application for
Husband filed suit against his wife in the Family Court at place 'L', whereas wife had filed suit for maintenance against her husband in the court at place `S'
Suit filed by the husband was sought by the wife to be transferred from the Family Court at place 'L' to Family Court at place 'S' where her suit for maintenance was pending
Since the marriage between the parties took place at place 'S' and suit filed by the wife for maintenance was also being tried in court at place 'S' the suit pending in Family Court at place 'L' was ordered to be transferred to Family Court at place '5' where both suits would be tried together.
Judgment & Decree
SAYED ZAHID HUSSAIN, J.
Suit titled "Sajjad Ahmad v. Saima Hassan" is sought to be transferred from the' Family Court, Lahore to Family Court, Sargodha where a suit for maintenance filed for the petitioner is statedly pending. The notice issued to the respondent has returned back unserved with a report that he does not reside at the given address. From the perusal of the plaint of the suit filed by the respondent himself is quite evident that it is the same address (where the notice was sent) as was given by him in suit. The conduct of the respondent appears to be evasive. He is proceeded ex parte. Since the marriage between the parties took place at Sargodha and suit filed by the petitioner for maintenance for herself and her minor is also being tried at Sargodha, I am inclined to order the transfer of the suit pending before they Family Court at Lahore to the Family Court at Sargodha where both the suits will be tried together. The said Court will proceed with the trial of the two suits after notice to the respondent. This application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. H.B.T./S-93/L Suit transferred.