1996 P Cr (PLP)
ALAM SHER — Petitioner Versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION LOWER MALL, LAHORE and 2
| Citation | 1996 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ALAM SHER — Petitioner Versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION LOWER MALL, LAHORE and 2 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1996 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1996 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1996 P Cr (PLP) (ALAM SHER — Petitioner Versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION LOWER MALL, LAHORE and 2). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Naseer Ahmed Bhutta for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 491
Petitioner had sought production of his wife from the custody of the respondent
Petition seemed to be a device to cut short the process of law
Proper remedy in such like matters was to file a suit for restitution of conjugal rights or to obtain warrants under S.100, Cr.P.C.-- Courts being custodian of the honour of the families, they have to put a check in exercising powers in such like matters of sensitive nature
Petition being based on mala fides and ulterior purposes was dismissed in limine.
Judgment & Decree
Respondents Criminal Miscellaneous No.526/H of 1996, decided on 9th May, 1996.
S. 491
Petitioner had sought production of his wife from the custody of the respondent
Petition seemed to be a device to cut short the process of law
Proper remedy in such like matters was to file a suit for restitution of conjugal rights or to obtain warrants under S.100, Cr.P.C.-- Courts being custodian of the honour of the families, they have to put a check in exercising powers in such like matters of sensitive nature
Petition being based on mala fides and ulterior purposes was dismissed in limine. Naseer Ahmed Bhutta for Petitioner. Alain Sher, petitioner, through this petition under section 491, Cr.P.C. seeks production of Mst. Saira allegedly, his wife from the custody of respondent No. 3.
2. This petition seems to be a device to cut short the process of law. The proper remedy in such like matters is to file a suit for restitution of conjugal rights or to obtain warrants under section 100 of the Cr.P.C. The Courts being custodian of the honour of the families has to put a check in exercising powers in such like matter of sensitive nature. The petition being based on mala fides and ulterior purposes is dismissed in limine. N.H.Q./A-64/L Petition dismissed.