MLD 1989

1989 PLP 649 (MLD)

ALLAH BAKHSH‑‑Petitioner Versus S.H.O., SAMMASATTA‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Writ Petition No. 1077 of 1988/BWP, decided on 9th January, 1989.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Munir Khan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989 PLP 649 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Muhammad Munir Khan, J
Parties ALLAH BAKHSH‑‑Petitioner Versus S.H.O., SAMMASATTA‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 649 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 649 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Munir Khan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 649 (MLD) (ALLAH BAKHSH‑‑Petitioner Versus S.H.O., SAMMASATTA‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

Representation

  • Zafar Ali Hashmi for Petitioner.
  • Malik Muhammad Aslam for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑Constitutional jurisdiction‑‑Registration of case‑‑Dispute regarding sale of tractor being of civil nature‑‑Petitioner can file private complaint if so advised‑‑Petition dismissed in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

Writ Petition No. 1077 of 1988/BWP, decided on 9th January, 1989. ‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑Constitutional jurisdiction‑‑Registration of case‑‑Dispute regarding sale of tractor being of civil nature‑‑Petitioner can file private complaint if so advised‑‑Petition dismissed in circumstances. Zafar Ali Hashmi for Petitioner. Malik Muhammad Aslam for Respondent. After hearing the parties and going through the saledeed of tractor etc., I feel that the dispute is of civil nature. The petitioner, however, may file complaint, if so advised.

2. S.H.O. submits unqualified apology and assures to be careful in future. He is warned to be careful in future. The notice is discharged. S.A./A-516/L Petition dismissed.