1983 PLP 903 (SCMR)
Mst. MAQBOOL BEGUM AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus GULLAN AND OTHERS-Respondents
| Citation | 1983 PLP 903 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | -- O. XXVI, r. 6-Review petition not drawn by Advocate who appeared and argued petition for leave to appeal before Supreme Court-Advocate-on-record filing application for grant of exemption in this respect and praying that presence of Advocate at time of review petition as laid down by O. XXVI, r. 6 be dispensed with-No sufficient ground having been made out, application not granted-Petition dismissed-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 188.-Review by Supreme Court. |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ |
| Parties | Mst. MAQBOOL BEGUM AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus GULLAN AND OTHERS-Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983 PLP 903 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983 PLP 903 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the -- O. XXVI, r. 6-Review petition not drawn by Advocate who appeared and argued petition for leave to appeal before Supreme Court-Advocate-on-record filing application for grant of exemption in this respect and praying that presence of Advocate at time of review petition as laid down by O. XXVI, r. 6 be dispensed with-No sufficient ground having been made out, application not granted-Petition dismissed-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 188.-Review by Supreme Court. bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1983 PLP 903 (SCMR) (Mst. MAQBOOL BEGUM AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus GULLAN AND OTHERS-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- ‑‑ O. XXVI, r. 6‑Review petition not drawn by Advocate who appeared and argued petition for leave to appeal before Supreme Court‑Advocate‑on‑record filing application for grant of exemption in this respect and praying that presence of Advocate at time of review petition as laid down by O. XXVI, r. 6 be dispensed with‑No sufficient ground having been made out, application not granted‑Petition dismissed‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 188.‑[Review by Supreme Court].
- M. Kowkab Iqbal, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Sh. Inayat Ali, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondent No. 1 (i to xi).
- Saeedur Rehman Farrukh, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents Nos. 2 and 3.
- The review petition is not drawn up by Mr. A. R. Shaikh, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, who appeared and argued Civil Petition No. 721 of 1981 before the Court, as provided by rule 6, Order XXVI of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980.
- Mr. Kowkab Iqbal, Advocate‑on‑Record, has, however, filed an application praying that exemption may be granted in this respect and the presence of Mr. A. R. Sheikh, Senior Advocate, at the time of hearing of the review petition, as laid down under rule 6, Order XXVI of the Supreme Court Rules, may be dispensed with.
Judgment & Decree
NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑This is a petition seeking review of this Court's order dated 2‑11‑1981 passed in Civil petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 721 of 1981. The review petition is not drawn up by Mr. A. R. Shaikh, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, who appeared and argued Civil Petition No. 721 of 1981 before the Court, as provided by rule 6, Order XXVI of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980. Mr. Kowkab Iqbal, Advocate‑on‑Record, has, however, filed an application praying that exemption may be granted in this respect and the presence of Mr. A. R. Sheikh, Senior Advocate, at the time of hearing of the review petition, as laid down under rule 6, Order XXVI of the Supreme Court Rules, may be dispensed with. We have considered these requests but do not find that any sufficient ground is made out for granting them. This petition is, therefore, dismissed for non‑compliance with the rules. M. Z. M. Petition dismissed.