1985 PLP 1596 (SCMR)
PAKISTAN RAILWAYS Appellant Versus GHULAM SARWAR — Respondent
| Citation | 1985 PLP 1596 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Abdul Kadir Shaikh and M.S.H. Quraishi, JJ |
| Parties | PAKISTAN RAILWAYS Appellant Versus GHULAM SARWAR — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 PLP 1596 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 PLP 1596 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Abdul Kadir Shaikh and M.S.H. Quraishi, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 PLP 1596 (SCMR) (PAKISTAN RAILWAYS Appellant Versus GHULAM SARWAR — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Akhlaque Ahmad Siddiqui, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by M . A . I . Qarni, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 15th January, 1985.
- Akhlaque Ahmad Siddiqui, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by M . A . I . Qarni, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the order, dated 6-6-1984 of the Federal Service Tribunal Camp at Karachi passed in Appeal No. 43(K) of 1982).
Art. 212--Civil service--Appeal before Service Tribunal--Service Tribunal not expressly dealing with points whether appeal was directed against order refusing grant of benefits claimed or against any other order--Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court and operation of order of Service Tribunal stayed.
Judgment & Decree
M.S.H. QURAISHI, J.‑‑It is contended that if the appeal before the Tribunal was directed against order, dated 6‑2‑1979 refusing the grant of benefits claimed, then the appeal filed on 13‑5‑1982 was clearly time‑barred and that if the appeal was directed against some other order, then as no such order has been specified, the appeal was not competent. These points have not been expressly dealt with by the Tribunal. Leave is granted. The operation of the impugned order shall be stayed. A. A, Leave granted.