1994 PLP 1974 (SCMR)
Sh. MUBARIK ALI and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Sh. ABDUR RASHID ‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1994 PLP 1974 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Sajjad Ali Shah and |
| Parties | Sh. MUBARIK ALI and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Sh. ABDUR RASHID ‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 1974 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 1974 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Sajjad Ali Shah and.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 1974 (SCMR) (Sh. MUBARIK ALI and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Sh. ABDUR RASHID ‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Aslam Sandhu, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Abul Aasim Jaferi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Hamid Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Salahuddin, Advocate‑on -Record for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 11th May, 1994.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court dated 20‑1‑1993 passed in civil Revisions Nos. 920 and 952 of 1983). ‑‑‑‑S. 12‑‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), OXXIII, R. 3‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal was disposed of in terms of compromise whereby respondent was to pay specified amount to petitioners as balance amount of sale before Sub‑Registrar; and petitioners were to execute sale‑deed in favour of respondent on receipt of said amount and were to have the sale‑deed registered before Sub‑Registrar on specified date.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑S. 12‑‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), OXXIII, R. 3‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal was disposed of in terms of compromise whereby respondent was to pay specified amount to petitioners as balance amount of sale before Sub‑Registrar; and petitioners were to execute sale‑deed in favour of respondent on receipt of said amount and were to have the sale‑deed registered before Sub‑Registrar on specified date. Ch. Muhammad Aslam Sandhu, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Abul Aasim Jaferi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners. Hamid Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Salahuddin, Advocate‑on -Record for Respondent. Date of hearing: 11th May, 1994. SAJJAD ALI SHAH, J.‑‑‑Learned counsel for the parties to these petitions have filed compromise in writing arrived at between them outside the X) Court. The terms of the compromise are as under:‑‑ (a) The respondent will pay Rs.60,000 (Rupees sixty thousand only) to the petitioners within one month before the Sub‑Registrar, Faisalabad as balance amount of the sale. (b) That the petitioners will execute sale‑deed in favour of the respondent on the receipt of the said amount of Rs.60,000 and will have the sale deed registered before the Sub‑Registrar, Faisalabad on 11th of June 1994.
2. The' petitions are disposed of in the terms stated above. A.A./M‑2088/S Petitions disposed of.