1976 PLP 387 (SCMR)
WALAYAT AGENCIES, LYALLPUR‑Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, RAWALPINDI‑Respondent
| Citation | 1976 PLP 387 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Yaqub Ali, C. J., Salahuddin Ahmed, |
| Parties | WALAYAT AGENCIES, LYALLPUR‑Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, RAWALPINDI‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Practice and procedure |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1976 PLP 387 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Practice and procedure as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1976 PLP 387 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Yaqub Ali, C. J., Salahuddin Ahmed,.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1976 PLP 387 (SCMR) (WALAYAT AGENCIES, LYALLPUR‑Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, RAWALPINDI‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ijaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Appellant.
- Muhammad Afzal Lone Advocate Supreme Court instructed by M. Afzal Siddiqi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.
- ‑‑ Both counsel retained by appellant declining to appear before Court presumably for not being paid their fees‑Advocate‑on‑record informing appellant of appeal having, been listed for hearing but appellant giving in reply‑‑Appeal dismissed for non‑ prosecution.
- MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, C. J.‑Mr. Ijaz Ahmad , Khan, Advocate- on‑Record for the appellant, has filed an application for withdrawal from the case as the appellant has not co‑operated with him in the prosecution of the appeal.
- Both the coup‑el retained by the appellant have declined to appear before the Court at Rawalpindi presumably because they have not been paid the fee. The Advocate‑on‑Record sent a registered letter to the appellant on 7‑1‑1976 informing him that the appeal was listed for hearing but he has sent no reply to him.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the erstwhile High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated 26th April 1966, in Civil Miscellaneous No. 314 of 1966). ‑‑ Both counsel retained by appellant declining to appear before Court presumably for not being paid their fees‑Advocate‑on‑record informing appellant of appeal having, been listed for hearing but appellant giving in reply‑‑Appeal dismissed for non‑ prosecution. Nemo of hearing :3rd January 1976.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, C. J.‑Mr. Ijaz Ahmad , Khan, Advocate- on‑Record for the appellant, has filed an application for withdrawal from the case as the appellant has not co‑operated with him in the prosecution of the appeal. Both the coup‑el retained by the appellant have declined to appear before the Court at Rawalpindi presumably because they have not been paid the fee. The Advocate‑on‑Record sent a registered letter to the appellant on 7‑1‑1976 informing him that the appeal was listed for hearing but he has sent no reply to him. The appeal is, in the circumstances, dismissed for non‑prosecution. There will be no order as to costs. Appeal dismissed.