2009 PLP 763 (SCMR)
POST MASTER-GEN1rRAL, N.-W.F.P. PESHAWAR — Petitioner Versus LIAQUAT ALI and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2009 PLP 763 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Abdul Hameed Dogar, C. J., Ijaz-ul-Hassan Khan and Ch. Ejaz Yousaf, JJ |
| Parties | POST MASTER-GEN1rRAL, N.-W.F.P. PESHAWAR — Petitioner Versus LIAQUAT ALI and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 763 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 763 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Abdul Hameed Dogar, C. J., Ijaz-ul-Hassan Khan and Ch. Ejaz Yousaf, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 763 (SCMR) (POST MASTER-GEN1rRAL, N.-W.F.P. PESHAWAR — Petitioner Versus LIAQUAT ALI and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Niaz Ahmad Rathore, D.A.-G. and Ch. Muhammad Akram, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 28-9-2007 in Appeal No.182(P(C.S.) of 2004 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal Islamabad).
Art. 212(3)
Petition for leave to appeal barred by 7 days
Contention of petitioner/government department was that it was due to lack of co-ordination between different departments that petition could not be filed within time
Such being hardly a ground for condonation of delay, contention was repelled and petition dismissed. Province of Punjab through Secretary, Education v. Kishwar Qudus Paul 2004 SCMR 571 ref.
Judgment & Decree
ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, C.J.
This petition at the face of it is barred by 7 days for which learned D.A.-G. submitted that it was due to lack of coordination between different departments, petitioner could not file petition within time. It is hardly a ground for condonation of delay. This Court in the case of Province of Punjab through Secretary, Education v. Kishwar Qudus Paul 2004 SCMR 571 on the somewhat similar ground had not condoned the delay of fourteen days for filing petition and dismissed the same finding no sufficient cause. Accordingly this petition being barred by time is dismissed and leave refused. M.B.A./P-7/SC Petition dismissed.