PCRLJ 1992

1992 P Cr (PLP)

IMAM BUX — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
N/A
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1992 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members N/A
Parties IMAM BUX — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 P Cr (PLP) (IMAM BUX — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Ataur Rehman for Petitioner. Niaz Ahmed Khan for the State.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497(2)

Customs Act (IV of 1969), S.156(1)(8)(89)

Bail, grant of-- Only allegation against accused was that he had rented out his house to main accused from where Charas was recovered and as such it was a case of further inquiry

Accused was allowed bail in circumstances

Judgment & Decree

The accused Imam Bux who is shown as absconder in the F.I.R. is facing trial under section 156(1)(8)(89) of the Customs Act, 1969, alongwith several others. The allegation against applicant in the final challan which has already been submitted in the case, is that he had rented out a house to the main accused Abdul Khaliq from where Charas was allegedly recovered. The aforesaid Abdul Khaliq has already been admitted to bail by this Court in Special Criminal Bail No.85 of 1988. Even otherwise the allegation against the present applicant in the challan only is that he had rented out his house to the main accused and as such it is a case of further enquiry. I accordingly admit the applicant to bail in the sum of Rs.2 lacs with one surety and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. N.H.Q./1-178/K Bail granted.