1986 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD HAYAT and 5 others Petitioners Versus THE STATE Respondent
| Citation | 1986 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ijaz Nizar, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD HAYAT and 5 others Petitioners Versus THE STATE Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Nizar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD HAYAT and 5 others Petitioners Versus THE STATE Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 307/324/323/149 & 148‑‑Bail‑ Cross‑version‑‑Co‑accused also receiving four injuries out of which one was grievous‑‑Prosecution totally suppressing such injuries Injured prosecution witnesses and three others had also been challaned under Ss. 148, 324 and 325/149, P.P.C. and were on bail‑‑As to which party was guilty of aggression, yet to be seen‑‑Accused allowed bail in circumstances. Abdul Wahid for the Petitioners. Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 307/324/323/149 & 148‑‑Bail‑ Cross‑version‑‑Co‑accused also receiving four injuries out of which one was grievous‑‑Prosecution totally suppressing such injuries Injured prosecution witnesses and three others had also been challaned under Ss. 148, 324 and 325/149, P.P.C. and were on bail‑‑As to which party was guilty of aggression, yet to be seen‑‑Accused allowed bail in circumstances. Abdul Wahid for the Petitioners. Nemo for the State. The petitioners alongwith Khan Muhammad co‑accused charged for murderously assaulting Muhammad Inayat and Muhammad Walayat P.Ws. with sticks and a hatchet on 8‑6‑1985. Seven injuries were found on the persons of Muhammad Inayat out of which one was grievous which is attributed to Khan Muhammad co‑accused. Seven simple injuries were found on the person of Muhammad Walayat P.W.
2. The motive for the offence was that Khan Muhammad aforementioned was constructing a wall of his house. Muhammad Inayat P.W. stopped him which led to an altercation between them. On the next day Khan Muhammad again started construction of the wall. Muhammad Inayat P.W. again objected whereupon Khan Muhammad and his companions attacked him and his brother Walayat.
3. Bail is urged on the grounds that there is a cross‑version. Khan Muhammad co‑accused had also received four injuries, out of which one was grievous. She informed P.Ws. and three others have also been challaned under sections 148, 324, 325/149, P.P.C. and they are on bail. The prosecution has totally suppressed his injuries. Khan Muhammad to whom the grievous injuries of Muhammad Inayat as alleged has not applied for bail. Challans of both the cases have been submitted to the Court, it is stated. It is further stated that the complainant party had no right to stop Khan Muhammad from constructing the wall.
4. As it is yet to be seen which party is guilty of aggression, I admit the petitioners to bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties each in the like, amount to the satisfaction of A Commissioner, Gujrat, M.A.K. Bail allowed.