MLD 1999

1999 PLP 1233 (MLD)

SARFARAZ AHMED — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
1996-May-30
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1999 PLP 1233 (MLD)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members N/A
Parties SARFARAZ AHMED — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999 PLP 1233 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999 PLP 1233 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1999 PLP 1233 (MLD) (SARFARAZ AHMED — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Headnotes / Summary

S.497

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 324/353/34

Bail, grant of

Despite firing having been exchanged between the parties from a close range nobody was injured from either side

Matter in circumstances needed further probe-- Accused was in custody for the last about one year and his trial had not so far commenced by the Trial Court

Bail was allowed to accused accordingly.

Judgment & Decree

Criminal Bail Application No. 670 of 1996, decided on 30th May, 1996.

S.497

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 324/353/34

Bail, grant of

Despite firing having been exchanged between the parties from a close range nobody was injured from either side

Matter in circumstances needed further probe-- Accused was in custody for the last about one year and his trial had not so far commenced by the Trial Court

Bail was allowed to accused accordingly. Mumtaz Ali Khan Deshmukh for Applicant. Habib Ahmed for the State. It is alleged that firing was exchanged between the parties from a close range but admittedly nobody was injured from the either side. This fact by itself requires further probe in the matter. The applicant is in custody since 19-4-1995 and till date even charge has not been framed against the applicant by the Trial Court. Under the circumstances, the applicant is entitled to bail. Accordingly, bail is granted to the applicant in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) and P.R. Bond of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. N.H.Q./S-89/K Bail allowed.