MLD 1994

1994 PLP 1248 (MLD)

SIKANDAR HAYAT — Petitioner Versus OMAR HAYAT and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
1994-January-9
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1994 PLP 1248 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties SIKANDAR HAYAT — Petitioner Versus OMAR HAYAT and another — Respondents
Primary Law Punjab Local Government Ordinance (VI of 1979)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 1248 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Local Government Ordinance (VI of 1979) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 1248 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 1248 (MLD) (SIKANDAR HAYAT — Petitioner Versus OMAR HAYAT and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Punjab Local Government Ordinance (VI of 1979)

Representation

  • Syed Kaleem Ahmad Khurshid for Petitioner.
  • Malik Muhammad Suleman Awan for A: G. for Respondents
  • 2. Malik Muhammad Suleman Awan Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of respondent and has raised preliminary objection that this writ petition has become infructuous in view of dissolution of all the Local Councils. Learned counsel for petitioner, however, states that the aforementioned dissolution is challenged in this Court and petitioner will avail legal remedy after the decision is given by this Court. Presently, he wants to withdraw this petition with permission to file another one if necessary. Order accordingly.

Headnotes / Summary

S.24

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199

Election petition

Order of Election Tribunal accepting election petition of respondent and setting aside election of petitioner as member of Local Council was challenged by petitioner in Constitutional petition

Objection was raised on behalf of respondent that Constitutional petition had become infructuous in view of dissolution of all Local Councils

Petitioner stated that dissolution of Local Councils having been challenged in High Court, he would avail legal remedy after decision was given by High Court and requested to withdraw Constitutional petition with permission to file another one, if necessary

High Court ordered accordingly.

Judgment & Decree

This Constitutional petition is directed against order dated 26-9-1992 of the Election Tribunal Bhalwal whereby election of petitioner as member of Local Council was set aside and the election petition of respondent was accepted.

2. Malik Muhammad Suleman Awan Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of respondent and has raised preliminary objection that this writ petition has become infructuous in view of dissolution of all the Local Councils. Learned counsel for petitioner, however, states that the aforementioned dissolution is challenged in this Court and petitioner will avail legal remedy after the decision is given by this Court. Presently, he wants to withdraw this petition with permission to file another one if necessary. Order accordingly. Disposed of. H.B.T./S-439/L Order accordingly.