2000 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Present: Irshad Hasan Khan, Raja Afrasiab Khan and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ MUHAMMAD. YOUSAF MALIK Versus WATER & POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman, WAPDA
| Citation | 2000 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Irshad Hasan Khan, Raja Afrasiab Khan and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ MUHAMMAD. YOUSAF MALIK |
| Parties | Present: Irshad Hasan Khan, Raja Afrasiab Khan and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ MUHAMMAD. YOUSAF MALIK Versus WATER & POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman, WAPDA |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2000 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2000 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Irshad Hasan Khan, Raja Afrasiab Khan and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ MUHAMMAD. YOUSAF MALIK.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2000 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (Present: Irshad Hasan Khan, Raja Afrasiab Khan and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ MUHAMMAD. YOUSAF MALIK Versus WATER & POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman, WAPDA). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Sharif, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents Nos. l and 2
- Muhammad Sharif, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmed, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents Nos. l and 2
- 3. When faced with this, Mr. Tanvir Ahmed, Advocate‑on‑Record submits that the enhanced rent could not be given to the petitioner because of the petition filed by the petitioner before this Court.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment/order of Federal Service Tribunal, Lahore dated 17-6-1997 passed in Appeal No. 92 (L) of 1997).
Art. 212(3)
Terms and conditions of service
Dispute was' with regard to payment of increase in house rent to civil servant by WAPDA
Service Tribunal found that the increase would be applicable after expiry of existing lease deed
Supreme Court directed WAPDA to pay enhanced rent to the petitioner from the date on which the payment of such increase in the rent became due within three weeks under intimation to the Registrar of the Court. Petitioner in person
Judgment & Decree
Petitioner in person Muhammad Sharif, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmed, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents Nos. l and 2 We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The dispute here in relates to grant of house rent ceiling of Rs.4,
920. The petitioner hired a house at the rate of Rs.4,
100. The rate was revised by WAPDA. The case of the petitioner before the Tribunal was that he was entitled to Rs.4,
920. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal on the ground that the revised rate was applicable to fresh hiring., However, the petition was dismissed with the observation that the increase will be applicable after. expiry of existing lease deed i.e. from 31‑1‑1997.
2. The petitioner states that enhanced rent has not been given to the petitioner w.e.f. 31‑1‑1997 by WAPDA in terms of the direction of the Tribunal.
3. When faced with this, Mr. Tanvir Ahmed, Advocate‑on‑Record submits that the enhanced rent could not be given to the petitioner because of the petition filed by the petitioner before this Court. In the circumstances, we direct WAPDA to pay enhanced rent at the rate of Rs.4,920 to the petitioner w.e.f. 31‑1‑1997 instead of‑29‑12‑1997 i.e. the date on which the payment of such increase in the rent became due A within 3 weeks from today under intimation to the Assistant Registrar of this Court With the above observation, the petition is disposed of. Q.M.H./M.A.K/M‑19/S Order accordingly.