1986 P Cr (PLP)
RAHIM BAKHSH‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1986 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Sharif, J |
| Parties | RAHIM BAKHSH‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Sharif, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 P Cr (PLP) (RAHIM BAKHSH‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sultan Ahmad for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497/498‑‑Pre‑arrest bail‑‑Simple injuries with Sota having been attributed to accused‑‑Accused party also injured but their injuries having been suppressed by prosecution‑‑Complainant's connivance wit1R police alleged‑‑Ad interim bail, already granted, therefore, confirmed. Kunwar Muhammad Younus for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 621/B of 1985, decided on 25th June, 1985 ‑‑‑S. 497/498‑‑Pre‑arrest bail‑‑Simple injuries with Sota having been attributed to accused‑‑Accused party also injured but their injuries having been suppressed by prosecution‑‑Complainant's connivance wit1R police alleged‑‑Ad interim bail, already granted, therefore, confirmed. Sultan Ahmad for Petitioner. Kunwar Muhammad Younus for the State. The petitioner was granted pre‑arrest bail by this Court on 18‑6‑1985. Simple injuries have been attributed to Rahim Bakhsh which he is alleged to have delivered by a Sots to the complainant. In this case the accused party was also injured, but there is no mention of their injuries in the F.I. R. The incident took place when Muhammad Shafi, the son of the petitioner while riding a mare peeped into the; house where Mst. Faizan was taking bath at that time. He was restrained from doing so and Mst. Faizan hurled invectives on Muhammad Shafi.
2. It has been contended on behalf of the complainant that mala fides and ulrerior motive have not been alleged in this petition. The perusal of this petition indicates that in para. 5 ground of this petition connivance of the complainant with the police has been alleged. In the circumstances, I confirm the bail already allowed to the petitioner till the disposal of the case against him. S.A. Petition accepted.