2009 PLP 674 (MLD)
Syed AFZAL ALI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2009 PLP 674 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Syed AFZAL ALI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 674 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 674 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 674 (MLD) (Syed AFZAL ALI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
Ss.497 & 103
West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), S.13(d)
Crime was offshoot of main cases registered against accused under Ss.6/9(c) of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 and under Ss.353/324/34, P.P.C., wherein accused had been enlarged on bail upon observing violation of S.103, Cr.P.C.
Judgment & Decree
SAJJAD ALI SHAH, J.
Through this application, applicant Syed Afzal Ali, seeks bail in Crime No.141 of 2008 registered at Police Station Chakiwara under section 13-D Arms Ordinance. The prosecution has alleged recovery of one Kalashnikov with loaded magazine containing 15 rounds and the accused, on demand, failed to produce license thereof. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the instant crime is offshoot of Crime No.143/2008 under section 6/9(c), Control of Narcotic Substance Act and Crime No.139/2008 under sections 353/ 324/34, P.P.C. wherein the applicant/ accused has been enlarged on bail upon observing violation of section 103 Cr.P.C., therefore the applicant is entitled to bail in this case, as well. Learned counsel for the State has no objection for grant of bail to the accused. Since the applicant is already on bail in the main cases and the instant case is offshoot of those eases where the Courts while granting bail have observed violation of section 103, Cr.P.C. Consequently, I admit the applicant/accused to bail subject to his furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 (Rupees one lac only) to the satisfaction of the trial court. H.B.T./A-52/K Bail granted.