PLC(CS) 2007

2007 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SAHIWAL and another Versus MUHAMMAD BOOTA ASIF

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Civil Petition No.2175-L of 2001, decided on 6th October; 2005.
Honorable Judges
Falak Sher and Syed Jamshed Ali, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2007 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Falak Sher and Syed Jamshed Ali, JJ
Parties DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SAHIWAL and another Versus MUHAMMAD BOOTA ASIF
Primary Law Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1999
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1999 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Falak Sher and Syed Jamshed Ali, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SAHIWAL and another Versus MUHAMMAD BOOTA ASIF). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1999

Representation

  • ----Rr. 3 & 4---Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S.4---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)---Dismissal from service---Respondent, who was proceeded against under provisions of Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1999, on four charges, was dismissed from service---Respondent filed appeal before Service Tribunal against order of his dismissal from service---Service Tribunal on examination of record, came to the conclusion that none of the charges against respondent stood proved and his appeal was allowed---Counsel for petitioner having not been able to point out any substantial question of law of public importance to warrant interference by Supreme Court, petition was dismissed.
  • M.A. Aziz, Advocate Supreme Court and Haji Muhammad Rafi Siddiqui, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
  • Muhammad Iqbal Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment, dated 27-4-2001 passed by Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore in Appeal No.3141 of 2000).

Judgment & Decree

SYED JAMSHED ALI, J.

The respondent, Junior Clerk in the office of the Deputy Commissioner, Sahiwal was proceeded against under the provisions of Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1999. There were primarily four charges and was dismissed by the competent authority vide order 7-4-2000. His departmental appeal having been rejected, he approached the learned Tribunal. On examination of the record it came to the conclusion that' none of the charges against the respondent stood proved. Accordingly, appeal of the respondent was allowed vide judgment, dated 27-4-2001. Leave is sought against this order. It was also noted that in any case a regular inquiry was necessary. The learned counsel has not been able to point out any substantial question of law of public importance to warrant interference by this Court.

2. This petition is dismissed. Leave is declined. H.B.T./D-28/SC Petition dismisse