1989 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD GULZAR‑‑Applicant Versus Mst. MARIAM and another‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1989 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Allahdino G. Memon, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD GULZAR‑‑Applicant Versus Mst. MARIAM and another‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Allahdino G. Memon, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD GULZAR‑‑Applicant Versus Mst. MARIAM and another‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Rafique Khanzada for Petitioner.
- S. Nasiruddin for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 491‑‑Detention‑‑Dctenu, a major, deposing in Court that she was 17 years cal age and that she never married accused with her own free will but marriage took place under force‑‑Detenu was living with her parents with her own free will and wanted to go back to her parents‑‑Detenu allowed to go wherever she liked. Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, A.A.‑G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 228 of 1987, decided on 19th July, 1987. ‑‑‑S. 491‑‑Detention‑‑Dctenu, a major, deposing in Court that she was 17 years cal age and that she never married accused with her own free will but marriage took place under force‑‑Detenu was living with her parents with her own free will and wanted to go back to her parents‑‑Detenu allowed to go wherever she liked. Muhammad Rafique Khanzada for Petitioner. S. Nasiruddin for Respondents. Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, A.A.‑G. for the State. Mst. Shagufta Doris has been produced by the respondent in Court today. Her statement has been recorded. She appears to be major and she has deposed in Court that she is aged about 17 years, and that she never married the applicant with her own free will but the marriage took place under force. She was living with her parents with her own free will. She wants to go back to her parents. Since the alleged detenu is major and wants to go back to her parents, she is allowed to go wherever she likes. M.Y.H./M‑625/K Order accordingly.