2006 P Cr (PLP)
ASIF RAZA — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ASIF RAZA — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 P Cr (PLP) (ASIF RAZA — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.392/34
Investigation in the case had been completed, challan had been submitted and no recovery had been effected though accused was arrested from the spot
Case against accused being of further inquiry, he was enlarged on bail, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
AMIR HANI MUSLIM, J.
The applicant was arrested in Crime No.285 of 2005 under section 392 read with section 34, P.P.C. registered at Police Station Baghdadi, Karachi (South). After arrest of the applicant formal challan was submitted and now the applicant is facing trial. The applicant has moved bail application before the trial Court, which was dismissed, inter alia, on the ground that since the applicant was apprehended at the spot, therefore, he is not entitled to the concession of bail. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that no recovery has been effected from the applicant and the maximum punishment for the alleged offence is 10 years and, therefore, the applicant is entitled to bail. As against this Learned A.A.-G. opposed the bail application as the applicant along with two other co-accused had robbed the mobile phone. According to him, the other two co-accused made their escape good while the applicant was arrested. I have heard the learned counsel and perused the record. Investigation has been completed, challan has been submitted and recovery has not been effected though the applicant was arrested from A the spot and therefore, in my view it is a case of further inquiry. Applicant is, therefore, enlarged on bail subject to his furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 with P. R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./A-88/K Bail granted.