2008 PLP 2683 (YLR)
ASGHER ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2008 PLP 2683 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Sardar Muhammad Aslam, J |
| Parties | ASGHER ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 2683 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 2683 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Sardar Muhammad Aslam, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 2683 (YLR) (ASGHER ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M. Tanveer Chaudhry for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Arts.3/4
Case of accused being at par with his co-accused who had been allowed bail, accused on principle of consistency, was also entitled to the same relief
Accused was admitted to bail, in circumstances. Said Rasool for the State along with Riaz, S.-I. with record.
Judgment & Decree
SARDAR MUHAMMAD ASLAM, J.
The petitioner seeks post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.588, dated 21-11-2005 registered under Articles 3/4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order 4 of 1979 with Police Station, Waris Khan, District Rawalpindi, on the grounds that the case of the petitioner is at par with his co-accused Tariq Mahmood, who has been allowed bail by this Court (Criminal Miscellaneous No. 346-B of 2006)
2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposed the grant of bail. However, conceded that the case of the petitioner is at par to that of his co-accused who has been allowed bail.
3. Heard. Record perused.
4. The petitioner on principle of consistency is also entitled to the same relief. Resultantly, this petition is accepted. Petitioner is admitted to bail provided he furnishes bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./A-27/L Bail granted.