1984 (PLP)
ZULFIQAR HUSSAIN-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent
| Citation | 1984 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ZULFIQAR HUSSAIN-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 (PLP) (ZULFIQAR HUSSAIN-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 409, 467, 468 & 471-Forgery-Evidence appreciation of -- Benefit of doubt-- Evidence of interested prosecution witnesses on material facts not only full of suspicion but also devoid of truth and contradictory - Delivery of disputed pay-orders to accused either through acquitted co-accused a postman, or someone else and genuineness of writing on specimen sheet allegedly in hand of accused, not proved beyond reasonable doubt-Two handwriting experts holding different opinions bout disputed writings -Evidence against acquitted co-accused believed by trial Court Accused given benefit of doubt and acquitted, in circumstances -- [Benefit of doubt].
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Appeal No. 246 of 1978, decided on 20th May, 198:1.
Ss. 409, 467, 468 & 471-Forgery-Evidence appreciation of -- Benefit of doubt-- Evidence of interested prosecution witnesses on material facts not only full of suspicion but also devoid of truth and contradictory - Delivery of disputed pay-orders to accused either through acquitted co-accused a postman, or someone else and genuineness of writing on specimen sheet allegedly in hand of accused, not proved beyond reasonable doubt-Two handwriting experts holding different opinions bout disputed writings -Evidence against acquitted co-accused believed by trial Court Accused given benefit of doubt and acquitted, in circumstances -- [Benefit of doubt]. P L D 1963 S C 51; P L D 1982 SC(A J & K)89 and P L D 1982 Kar. 255 ref. S. Saghir Hussain Jafri for Appellant, G. A. Warsi for the State Date of hearing: 10th May, 1984.