1990 PLP 1240 (SCMR)
KHADIM HUSSAIN and others‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1990 PLP 1240 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Haleem, CJ., Shafiur Rahman, Saad Saood Jan, Ali Hussain Qazilbash and Naimuddin, JJ |
| Parties | KHADIM HUSSAIN and others‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 1240 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 1240 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Haleem, CJ., Shafiur Rahman, Saad Saood Jan, Ali Hussain Qazilbash and Naimuddin, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 1240 (SCMR) (KHADIM HUSSAIN and others‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Raza Kazim, Advocate Supreme Court and Manzoor Ilahi, Advocate‑on- Record for Petitioners.
- Date of hearing: 29th October, 1989.
- M. Bilal, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Muhammad Khan Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for the Petitioners (in CMPs.Nos.321‑R and 322 8 of 1989 and unnumbered C.M.P).
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order dated 20‑4‑1989 of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad in Appeal No.147‑R of 1985). ‑‑‑Art.212(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal‑‑‑Respondents having conceded the stand taken by petitioner, petition was converted into appeal and was allowed accordingly after setting aside impugned order‑‑‑Petitioners in miscellaneous application praying to be impleaded as parties in main petition on ground that their right would be affected by concession of respondents who were not parties in appeal before Service Tribunal, had no locus standi to challenge that concession at that stage. M. Bilal, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Muhammad Khan Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for the Petitioners (in CMPs.Nos.321‑R and 322 8 of 1989 and unnumbered C.M.P).
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J.‑‑‑Upon hearing the petitioner we convert this petition into an appeal, and allow it in terms of the concession by the counsel for the respondents in his written application that 4hc respondents "have decided to concede to the stand taken by the petitioner." In view of this concession, the impugned order is set aside. The petitioners in Civil Miscellaneous Petitions Nos.321‑R of 1989, 322‑ A R of 1989 and in an unnumbered Civil Miscellaneous Petition, have prayed to be impleaded as parties in the main petition, as they contend that their right would be affected by the concession of the respondents. Since they were not parties in the appeal before the Service Tribunal, they have no locus standi to challenge the concession at this stage. Accordingly, the petitions are rejected. H.B.T./K‑128/S Order accordingly.