1992 P Cr (PLP)
Haji LIAQUAT HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. ROBINA YASMIN‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1992 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Tanvir Ahmad Khan, J |
| Parties | Haji LIAQUAT HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. ROBINA YASMIN‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Tanvir Ahmad Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 P Cr (PLP) (Haji LIAQUAT HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. ROBINA YASMIN‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Tahir Nasim Sabir for Petitioner.
- Amanat Ali Bokhari for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 561‑A‑‑‑Petitioner's counsel made a statement that he would not press the petition if a direction for the disposal of proceedings within three months was made‑‑‑Request being reasonable, Trial Magistrate was directed to conclude the proceedings resulting from the complaint made by respondent within three months‑‑‑Petition was disposed of with the said direction.
Judgment & Decree
Tahir Nasim Sabir for Petitioner. Amanat Ali Bokhari for Respondent. Petitioner has filed this petition for the quashment of proceedings pending in the Court of Mr. Khalid Mehmood Sheikh, Magistrate 1stClass, Lahore, which had emanated out of a complaint submitted by Mst. Robina Yasmin respondent on 25‑4‑1990. It is pertinent to mention here that the petitioner riled Criminal Miscellaneous No.156/Q of 1991 earlier, which was disposed of on 10‑6‑1991 with the direction that the learned trial Court shall conclude the proceedings within two months. However, the aforesaid directions have not so far been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement that he would not press this petition if a direction for the disposal of the proceedings within three months is made. The request is genuine. Accordingly, it is directed that the trial Magistrate shall conclude these proceedings before 30th of May, 1992. Office is directed to transmit this order to the learned trial Court for compliance. Petitioner shall also produce this order before the learned trial Magistrate. The petition is disposed of with the above direction. N.H.Q./L‑10/L Order accordingly.