1989 P Cr (PLP)
NAZIM KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ijaz Nisar, J |
| Parties | NAZIM KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Nisar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 P Cr (PLP) (NAZIM KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Syed Nadeem Saqlain for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.325‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑F.I.R. delayed‑ Complainant and other witnesses not relied upon by police in respect of majority of other accused persons, who were declared innocent‑‑Bail allowed to accused in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.325‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑F.I.R. delayed‑ Complainant and other witnesses not relied upon by police in respect of majority of other accused persons, who were declared innocent‑‑Bail allowed to accused in circumstances. Syed Nadeem Saqlain for Petitioner. Nazim Khan petitioner seeks (bail in case under section 148/325/149, P.P.C. on the allegation that he alongwith four others caused stick injuries to Nazir P.W. on 13‑5‑1988. The injured was medically examined and 6 injuries were found on his person out of which one was grievous having caused fracture of the left forearm which is attributed to the petitioner.
2. Bail is pleaded on the ground that the petitioner has been involved on account of enmity and further that all of the other co‑accused have been found innocent. It is further stated that his person is no longer required for purpose of investigation for the challan has been submitted in Court. There is delay of one day in the F.I.R. it is added.
3. Keeping in view the delay in the F.I.R. as also the fact that the complainant and other witnesses have not been relied upon by the police in respect of the majority of the other accused, I admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C., Gujrat. S.A./N‑214/L Bail granted,