1981 PLP 1728 (CLC)
Haji MUHAMMAD SHAFI‑Petitioner Versus Mst. RANI AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
| Citation | 1981 PLP 1728 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Ilyas, J |
| Parties | Haji MUHAMMAD SHAFI‑Petitioner Versus Mst. RANI AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1728 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1728 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Ilyas, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1728 (CLC) (Haji MUHAMMAD SHAFI‑Petitioner Versus Mst. RANI AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian Muhammad Siddique Kamyana for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑ O. VII, r. 7 read with S. 100‑Plaint‑Relief‑Appellate Court, powers of‑‑Appellate Court can also do what trial Court could do Main respondent owner of disputed shop‑Shop sold out to petitioner by a person alleging to be such respondent's Special Attorney‑ Main respondent challenging sale by means of a suit and applying for appointment of a Receiver and trial Court appointing Receiver accordingly‑Appellate Court setting aside order for appointment of Receiver and directing petitioner to deposit rent of disputed shop during pendency of suit‑Appellate Court, held, could give direction relating to deposit of rent even though none of parties asked for such direction. Secretary to Government, West Pakistan (Now N.‑F. P. Department of Agricultural and Forests, Peshawar) and 4 others v. Kazi Abdul Kafil P L D 1978 S C 242 ; Marghub Siddiqi v. Hamid Ahmad Khan and 2 others 1974 S C M R 519 and Muhammad Yakoob v. Muhammad Ishaque 1980 C L C 2056 distinguished. ,
Judgment & Decree
Mst. RANI AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents Civil Revision No. 642 of 1981, decided on 16th June, 1981. ‑‑ O. VII, r. 7 read with S. 100‑Plaint‑Relief‑Appellate Court, powers of‑‑Appellate Court can also do what trial Court could do Main respondent owner of disputed shop‑Shop sold out to petitioner by a person alleging to be such respondent's Special Attorney‑ Main respondent challenging sale by means of a suit and applying for appointment of a Receiver and trial Court appointing Receiver accordingly‑Appellate Court setting aside order for appointment of Receiver and directing petitioner to deposit rent of disputed shop during pendency of suit‑Appellate Court, held, could give direction relating to deposit of rent even though none of parties asked for such direction. Secretary to Government, West Pakistan (Now N.‑F. P. Department of Agricultural and Forests, Peshawar) and 4 others v. Kazi Abdul Kafil P L D 1978 S C 242 ; Marghub Siddiqi v. Hamid Ahmad Khan and 2 others 1974 S C M R 519 and Muhammad Yakoob v. Muhammad Ishaque 1980 C L C 2056 distinguished. , Mian Muhammad Siddique Kamyana for Petitioner.