2006 PLP 1482 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD KHALID HUSSAIN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 PLP 1482 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD KHALID HUSSAIN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 1482 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 1482 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 1482 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD KHALID HUSSAIN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 426
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.324 & 337-F(iii)
Application for suspension of sentence
Accused was convicted under S.337-F(iii), P.P.C. without framing of the charge
Accused had already served out sentence awarded to him under S.337-F(iii), P.P.C. and only question left was whether sentence awarded to accused under S.324, P.P.C., was warranted or not
Sentence awarded to accused was suspended and he was released on bail accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
Mrs. YASMIN ABBASEY, J.
By this application appellant has sought suspension of sentence awarded to him vide impugned judgment. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the appellant that this Appellant has been convicted under section 337-F (iii), P.P.C. without framing of the charge, which is evident from the very judgment, however, the Appellant has already served out the sentence awarded to him under section 337-F(iii), P.P.C. and now only the question left is whether the sentence awarded under section 324, P.P.C. is warranted or not. Under the circumstances of the case, Mr. Anwar H. Ansari, learned State Counsel has stated no objection to the suspension of sentence. For the forgoing reasons, the sentence is suspended and Appellant Muhammad Khalid is allowed to be released on bail subject to B furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs. 100,000 (Rupees One Lac) and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Additional Registrar of this Court. H.B.T./M-85/K??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Sentence suspended.