1991 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD ARSHAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1991 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ARSHAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD ARSHAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Rai M. Nawaz Kharal for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 304-A & 338
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.439
Accused who had not challenged his conviction stated that since by now he had served the entire sentence awarded to him, as such he was no more interested in prosecution of revision
Accused having not pressed petition, same was disposed of accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
Rai M. Nawaz Kharal for Petitioner. Mrs. Yasmin Sahgal for the State. Date of hearing: 22nd April, 1991. Muhammad Arshad, petitioner was tried under sections 3044, 279 and 336, P.P.C, by Magistrate Section 30, Faisalabad, for causing the death of Muhammad Younis by rash and negligent driving.
2. On the conclusion of the trial, he was convicted under section 304-A, P.P.C. and sentenced to four years' R.I. and a fine of Rs.6,000 or in default thereof one year's R.I. It w s directed that the fine, if recovered, Rs.5,000 be paid to the legal heirs of Muhammad Younis deceased. On appeal, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faisalabad, altered the conviction from section 304-A to section 338, P.P.C. and sentenced him to one and a half years' R.I. and a fine of Rs.6,000 hence this revision.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not challenged the conviction of the petitioner. He states that since the petitioner has, by now, served the entire sentence, therefore, he is no more interested in the prosecution of this revision. He has decided not to press this petition. Disposed of accordingly. H.B.T./M-2973/L Order accordingly.