2010 PLP 1891 (MLD)
Mst. ZOHRA BIBI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2010 PLP 1891 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Mst. ZOHRA BIBI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 1891 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 1891 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 1891 (MLD) (Mst. ZOHRA BIBI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Hammad Akbar Wallana for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Ss.9(c) & 15-Possession of narcotics
Quantity of narcotics recovered from accused was on the upper limit prescribed in S.9(b) of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997
Accused was stated to be previous non-convict and behind the bars since 14-7-2010, (date of arrest)
Judgment & Decree
CH. IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN, J.
Petitioner Mst. Zohra Bibi through the instant petition has sought for post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.59 registered under section 9(c)/15 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 with Police Station ANF, Lahore on 14-7-2010.
2. Briefly the prosecution case as per the F.I.R. is that on the said date i.e. on 14-7-2010 at about 2-15 p.m., she had in her possession 1 Kg. charas.
3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record, we find that the quantity of narcotic recovered from her is on the upper limit prescribed in section 9(b) of the aforesaid Act. She is stated to be previous non-convict and behind the bars since the date of her arrest.
4. We, therefore, have been persuaded to hold her case to be an appropriate one for the relief prayed for. We, therefore, accept this petition and admit her to bail subject to her furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 (Rupees one lac only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./Z-37/L Bail granted.