1994 PLP 1126 (SCMR)
NASEER AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCF, OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Communication and Works Department and another‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1994 PLP 1126 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | NASEER AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCF, OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Communication and Works Department and another‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 1126 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 1126 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 1126 (SCMR) (NASEER AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCF, OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Communication and Works Department and another‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 18th October, 1993.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment/order of this Court dated 12th June, 1991 in Civil Appeal No. 337 of 1989). ‑‑‑‑Art.188‑‑‑Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O. XXVI, R. 1‑‑‑Review of Supreme Court judgment‑‑‑Supreme Court, after hearing arguments in support of review application, directing respondent that in the enquiry that might be conducted by Provincial Government observations made by Supreme Court in appeal under review, should be ignored and Inquiry Officer should base his finding entirely on evidence laid before him‑‑‑Review application was disposed of in terms of such observation.
Judgment & Decree
SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.‑‑‑After hearing the learned counsel we direct that in the enquiry that may be held by the Provincial Government the observations made by this Court in Civil Appeal No337 of 1989 should be ignored and the inquiry officer should base his finding entirely on the evidence laid before him. With these observations this review petition is disposed of. AA./N‑358/S Order accordingly.