1968 PLP 1285 (SCMR)
GHULAM QADIR‑Petitioner Versus MANIK AND OTHERS‑Respondents
| Citation | 1968 PLP 1285 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | GHULAM QADIR‑Petitioner Versus MANIK AND OTHERS‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1962) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1968 PLP 1285 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1962) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1968 PLP 1285 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1968 PLP 1285 (SCMR) (GHULAM QADIR‑Petitioner Versus MANIK AND OTHERS‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Khalil‑ur‑Rahman Khan (absent), Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Saline Ahmad Malik, Attorney for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 24th June 1968.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 23rd October 1967,. in Criminal Appeal No. 732 of 1966).
Art. 58(3) and Supreme Court Fines, 1956, O. XIII, r. 1‑Petition for Special Leave to Appeal in criminal case barred by 56 days‑That petitioner, an old man was living in a remote place and hence limitation be computed from date of his knowledge of High Court judgment‑Held : no legal grounds‑Petition dismissed as barred by time. ORDER MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J.‑This petition for special leave to appeal in a civil matter is barred by 56 days and no adequate explanation for condonation of delay is made to appear. It is stated that the petitioner who is an old man lives 30 miles away front Rahimyar Khan; that he took considerable time for collecting necessary funds to file the petition and that limitation should be computed from his knowledge of the judgment of the High Court. None of the pleas constitute a legal ground within Order XIII, rule
1. The petition is dismissed as barred by time. Leave refused.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J.‑This petition for special leave to appeal in a civil matter is barred by 56 days and no adequate explanation for condonation of delay is made to appear. It is stated that the petitioner who is an old man lives 30 miles away front Rahimyar Khan; that he took considerable time for collecting necessary funds to file the petition and that limitation should be computed from his knowledge of the judgment of the High Court. None of the pleas constitute a legal ground within Order XIII, rule
1. The petition is dismissed as barred by time. Leave refused.