CLC 1981

1981 PLP 1044 (CLC)

MUSHTAQ AHMED‑Petitioner Versus MEMBER II, FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION AND 2 others — ‑ Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Constitutional Petition No. D‑173 of 1977, decided on 2nd September. 1979.
Honorable Judges
Abdul Hajeez Memon and S. A. Nusrat. JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1981 PLP 1044 (CLC)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Abdul Hajeez Memon and S. A. Nusrat. JJ
Parties MUSHTAQ AHMED‑Petitioner Versus MEMBER II, FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION AND 2 others — ‑ Respondents
Primary Law Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 [M. L. R. 115]‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1044 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 [M. L. R. 115]‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1044 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Abdul Hajeez Memon and S. A. Nusrat. JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1044 (CLC) (MUSHTAQ AHMED‑Petitioner Versus MEMBER II, FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION AND 2 others — ‑ Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 [M. L. R. 115]‑

Representation

  • --‑‑ Para 29, proviso read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XIX‑--Natural justice, principle of‑‑Opportunity of hearing-- Counsel for petitioner filing affidavits controverting allegation in impugned order as to petitioner having been present alongwith his counsel during hearing of case‑Petitioner also filing a certificate issued by Deputy Commissioner of another District categorically confirming petitioner having been on duty in his office on date of hearing of case‑Counter affidavit filed on , behalf of respondents penurious‑Affidavits filed by counsel, in circumstances, held, could not be ignored and impugned order liable to be set aside for having been passed without according opportunity of hearing to petitioner. [Natural justice, principle of].
  • Ismall Memon for Petitioner.
  • Sabir Hussain Rehmani for Respondent No. 1.
  • Date of hearing : 2nd September, 1979

Headnotes / Summary

Nemo for the Remaining Respondents.

Judgment & Decree

Constitutional Petition No. D‑173 of 1977, decided on 2nd September. 1979. --‑‑ Para 29, proviso read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XIX‑--Natural justice, principle of‑‑Opportunity of hearing-- Counsel for petitioner filing affidavits controverting allegation in impugned order as to petitioner having been present alongwith his counsel during hearing of case‑Petitioner also filing a certificate issued by Deputy Commissioner of another District categorically confirming petitioner having been on duty in his office on date of hearing of case‑Counter affidavit filed on , behalf of respondents penurious‑Affidavits filed by counsel, in circumstances, held, could not be ignored and impugned order liable to be set aside for having been passed without according opportunity of hearing to petitioner. [Natural justice, principle of]. Ismall Memon for Petitioner. Sabir Hussain Rehmani for Respondent No.

1. Nemo for the Remaining Respondents. Date of hearing : 2nd September, 1979