1987 PLP 1989 (MLD)
NASIR MAHMOOD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1989 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Munir Khan, J |
| Parties | NASIR MAHMOOD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1989 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1989 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Munir Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1989 (MLD) (NASIR MAHMOOD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Q.M. Saleem for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.379 & 411--Bail, grant of- Stolen property already recovered--Accused no more required for investigation--Offence not falling within prohibitory clause--Bail granted in circumstances. Farrukh Humayun for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Q.M. Saleem for Petitioner. Farrukh Humayun for the State. This is an application for the grant of bail to Nasir Mahmood petitioner in case under section 379/411, P.P.C. registered at P.S. Nishatabad vide F.I.R. No. 105, dated 17-4-1987.
2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner was found selling stolen articles of the mills valuing Rs. 2,000.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged offences do not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P. C. The learned counsel for the State has opposed this application.
4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. I find that the stolen property has already been recovered; that the petitioner is no more required for investigation and that the alleged offences do not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C.
5. For what has been said above, the petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C. /Illaqa Magistrate, Faisalabad. S.A. /N-55/L