1982 PLP 911 (SCMR)
ALLAH BAKHSH-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
| Citation | 1982 PLP 911 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | --- O. XXVI, r. 1-Review-Criminal appeal against conviction dis missed for appellant's being fugitive from law-Petitioner remaining a fugitive from law-Held, not entitled to seek any relief even by review.-Review by Supreme Court. |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ALLAH BAKHSH-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1982 PLP 911 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1982 PLP 911 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the --- O. XXVI, r. 1-Review-Criminal appeal against conviction dis missed for appellant's being fugitive from law-Petitioner remaining a fugitive from law-Held, not entitled to seek any relief even by review.-Review by Supreme Court. bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1982 PLP 911 (SCMR) (ALLAH BAKHSH-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- --- O. XXVI, r. 1-Review-Criminal appeal against conviction dis missed for appellant's being fugitive from law-Petitioner remaining a fugitive from law-Held, not entitled to seek any relief even by review.-[Review by Supreme Court].
- Raja Muhammad Anwar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing : 23rd February, 1982.
- Raja Muhammad Anwar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Supreme Court Rules, 1956 Hayat v. State P L D 1981. S .C 265 rel. Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑Heard. The appeal of the petitioner was dis missed by our judgment dated 8‑7‑1981 because he having become a fugitive from law not found entitled to any relief as held in our judgment in Hayat v, State (P L D 1981 S C 265). Review is sought on the ground that the petitioner is entitled t the same benefit as extended to his co‑convicts in the impugned judgment.
2. As held in the case of Hayat Bakhsh the petitioner having remained a fugitive from law is not entitled to seek any relief even by review. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed. He may, if so advised, seek relief from the executive authorities. Petition dismissed.