2006 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD AALIM — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD AALIM — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD AALIM — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ALI SAIN DINO MAITLO, J.--- Heard Messrs Muhammad Ayaz Soomro, Advocate for the applicant and Mushtaque Ahmed Abbasi, the learned Assistant Advocate-General. The latter has no objection for the grant of bail.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), S.13(b)
Allegation against accused was that he, while being in custody in murder case, led to discovery of Klashnikov, allegedly used in the offence, from a heap of hay
Accused had all along remained in custody and a period of more than one year had passed
Trial had not concluded and accused was admitted to bail in murder case
Offence in question against accused did not come within the prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr.P.C. and in circumstances of case no special reasons were available for refusal of bail
Judgment & Decree
ALI SAIN DINO MAITLO, J.
Heard Messrs Muhammad Ayaz Soomro, Advocate for the applicant and Mushtaque Ahmed Abbasi, the learned Assistant Advocate-General. The latter has no objection for the grant of bail. The allegation against the applicant is that on 28-9-2004 he while being in custody in a murder case bearing F.I.R. No.13 of 2004 of Police Station Garhi Hassan, led to the discovery of a klashnikov, allegedly used in the murder case, from a heap of hay at an open threshing floor. The applicant has all along remained in custody and a period of more than one year has passed. The trial has not concluded. He has been admitted to bail by this Court in the murder case. The offence does not come within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. and in the given circumstance of the case there are no special reasons for the refusal of bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the applicant is admitted to bail in the sum of Rs.50,000 with one surety and personal recognizance in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Bail application stands disposed of along with listed application. H.B.T./M-17/K Bail granted.